Why is Ronaldinho the same Star10 coin and failure?

From his list of Star10 has gone a sudden decline: -51 % in 24 hours and -80 % since its start. What could have been a simple correction after starting has turned into a real debacle, investors massively destroy their positions. Why such a rejection?

First, the GOPLUS Security warning will ignite the powder: The SMART token contract allowed the team to burn the holders at any time. In other words, the initial team has retained exaggerated control of assets that can theoretically destroy user resources without prior warning. In the face of the stir, the developers gave up this function, but evil was done: Star10 was now perceived as a high -risk token.

The same market then passes through the crisis of trust. Scams multiply and investors have an easy trigger to go out in the least warnings. The collapse of the token of the pound Javier Milei (-94 % after the carpent move of the dedicated) recently called Ghosts. In this climate, any project with fragile foundations is immediately sanctioned.

Unfavorable context and sealed reputation

The golden era of the same seems to be over. According to Dune Analytics, the number of new projects has fallen by 80 %since the end of February 2025. Specifically, the enthusiasm of investors for “Cryptos meme” has dried up strongly, making fundraising more difficult and running much more difficult than before. Such the opposite wind was definitely weighed on the Star10, maybe he started too late in the trend.

In parallel, the market was flooded with spectacular fraud. False token “KSA”, allegedly called Mohammed bin Salmane, cheated millions of millions before disappearance. Because, he was to be supported by the Central African government, he experienced the same fate. Add many hacks of x accounts to promote false projects and get an ultra set climate where the smallest anomalies lead to a massive dump.

In the end, Ronaldinho himself in the crypt pulls loudly famous passive. In 2023, it was involved in 18 Kronaldinho, a pyramid scheme that would sip $ 61 million. The case caused a stir, and although the former star of Barça denied all responsibility, the shadow of the scandal always floats. In addition, he has already promoted several NFTs and chips that proved to be a pump and a landfill such as the World Cup or Brett. Result: torn credibility with the crypt community.

Morality History: You can’t make an omelet without breaking eggs … But here Ronaldinho just broke his wallets.

Notification of irresponsibility

Notice of non -response: In accordance with the TRUST project, Beincrypto undertakes to provide impartial and transparent information. The aim of this article is to provide accurate and relevant information. However, we invite readers to check their own facts and consult a professional before you decide on the basis of this content.

Leave a Comment